If you arrive at a juncture, where you just can’t evade foreign “chanting”, on and offline; being phrases continuously projected towards you, as far as AIP (Artifice Intelligent Property) goes, there is little to be done, or at least one might think.

Not a graft, but a remedy, is to locate their coordinates, in their nativity, in a land far, far away, and adjust accordingly. And with AIP, this was done from shifting over the medium term, from Natural Language Processing (NLP), to WXV’s Fluent Language Processing (FLP™).

One might suppose that this situation is only an illusion, however, there is much to be learned about such a scenario, and that type of AI, and is why being agile, and not “locked in”, on a programming language, is a surefire way to advance in regards to noise pollution, and urban nutrition.

Like most org designers, whom craft an org design, they are, every time, designed by them, to have an absence of problems. And in many cases there are no solutions tied to an org design.

They look easy to create, some org designers create one or two a year, others, a multitude; but regardless of quantity associated with an org, the quality is the most important part: as mentioned, not necessarily for a net gain however.

Restricting the outcome of what an org design does to a reader, is where the trained org designer and not trained, are separated.

On occasion, the impossibility of remaining clone free, does occur. As artificial intelligence learns how to replicate even the most complex of deterrents of raw intellectual property.

If plausible, scheduling the site map, as far releasing what the organisation is, of say, a website, and the relative updates, can serve to the public, the best way to reveal, what the clones are cloning, and in what time frame.

Because time moves forward, this is a great solution to preserving intangibles and their prior art. As there can be only a singular calendar event per individual, or personal, entity; which is the case of WXV.

New user acquisition is where companies know that treating users like royalty in the onboarding process is important, as they don’t want to be perceived as being robotic. The reality is, today, it is difficult to discern whether or not a voice is human or not because of the telemarketer’s continuity training.

This means because of telecommunications standards, the importance of being entirely clear and having a true sounding vocal clarity is what makes reaching the sale stage of acquisition easier. There is also the globalisation standard, which means that the reason why telemarketers sound like robots in many cases, is so that the buyer does not know where they are located, who they are, or what they know.

All in all, being clear (regardless of robotic sentiments), is what gets telecom companies to win, with a human touch, whether or not they are serving, automated robots.

With the emergence of new forms° of the commons, there is more content available than ever for practitioners to use everyday. The problem is, how can users know if any given asset has already been used?

This is where it helps to be early and often, and humble as far as quantity of commons assets consumed. It has been said before that as far as intellectual property goes, the commons is not endgame, but without such a pool of resources, there would be an enormous outflow of innovative activity.

In some markets, where its difficult to create assets because of geographical or jurisdictional constraints, the commons is a lifesaver; just be aware of the tragedy of the commons and that without contributions in some manifestation to that market, new participants won’t be able to enjoy the startup benefits at all.