When analysing the health of a technologic application like a LLM, it is important to look at this like an accessibility right.
This is because of the natural language processing heritage, a LLM has, and the type of programmer whom gets involved with such a model.
For WXV, the tech stack right has been leading itself towards crystallising itself from being an intraweb(s), into being comprehensible, also, as being a LLM.
If you have a premonition in the form of IP, the question is if they are on schedule.
When we say on schedule, meaning the set in stone approach to forecasting of an event, in most cases, on an individual.
In IP, as a source of record, it is important to know if a premonition cured (as a solution, not a problem), or if it didn’t, which all is more likely if the forecast is correct, as far as dates are concerned.
There is a constant battle between how much to share and how much to silo.
The great thing about intellectual property, is that existing frameworks (and the Tyner Group framework), make it easy to do both.
With the right frameworking, there can never be enough innovation to share and information to silo.
The number one reason WXV evolved through an intellectual property lens, is because of Ian Tyner’s (Founding Director, Owner, my), historical beginnings within international law.
And the reason for what success WXV has been fortunate enough to be a part of, within intellectual property and not, is a direct result of pre WXV histories local and global.
In this continuator, sharing about what WXV was supposed to be, a long time ago, and what this has become, is essential to know for this audience.
When people say that ideas aren’t worth anything, this could be because they haven’t given their ideas bounds.
Restricting the borders of ideas, creates value, and shifts the idea from existing, to being managed.
Providing a framework related to these bounds and ideas, creates even further value, than a borderless idea.