Like most, trying to locate where in the world, to generate or contribute to a new opportunity can be arduous.
Which is why knowing that looking for a residual opportunity is that much more difficult.
What residual relationships have you been a part of, and how did they differ from mutually beneficial agreements?
With so many entrants in the marketplace competing for a small square, the success factors of an entity can be arbitrary.
Unless you have a programme that you follow, and you play by the rules.
For WXV, anything involving its assets programme, whether it be education or implementation is par of the course, as an asset manager, for the improvement of daily successful executables and unarbitrary futures.
When analysing the health of a technologic application like a LLM, it is important to look at this like an accessibility right.
This is because of the natural language processing heritage, a LLM has, and the type of programmer whom gets involved with such a model.
For WXV, the tech stack right has been leading itself towards crystallising itself from being an intraweb(s), into being comprehensible, also, as being a LLM.
Economics can take years to prove true, if the numbers don’t change (that much).
With WXV the challenge has been, how can existing and future customers best get catered to, at an affordable rate?
With a multi positioned pricing model, and tokenisation economic valuator, issues like the cost of living, mid marketing and lux life have been attended to.
The number one reason WXV evolved through an intellectual property lens, is because of Ian Tyner’s (Founding Director, Owner, my), historical beginnings within international law.
And the reason for what success WXV has been fortunate enough to be a part of, within intellectual property and not, is a direct result of pre WXV histories local and global.
In this continuator, sharing about what WXV was supposed to be, a long time ago, and what this has become, is essential to know for this audience.