Essentially wrapping isn’t illegal, if this is done with proprietary information. However, if someone else’s data is wrapped, and the consumer doesn’t know, then there could be an issue.

On occasion, you might see, an entire “geofenced” website, wrapped, so that the visitor has no idea, that they’re actually visiting a competitor’s domain, and not viewing the content that they are aiming at signing up to.

While a controversial topic, when the wrapping is of a smaller scale, and the intangible data is all privately owned, then there isn’t really an ethics issue. The primary rationale behind bringing wrapping up as a topic, is that when there are more than one illegal domain geofenced wrapping issues on a singular entity, the fraud usually takes care of itself and the violation goes away.

Living in a jurisdiction, which already highlights the importance of law via the curves and contours of land development and the associated maps, which were created, in the form of “court” and “courts”, personalities know how important legal comprehension is already, down to the individual level, of being a lawyer (even if you’re not educated professionally in law), or even owning a court (albeit, you not being a judge, or an official court owner).

Overtime, it is possible to go through these loops, like WXV did, not aware that this cultural distinction was already in place, and inevitably understanding, that this origination was the number one reason, why this type of law became a part of this ethos.

This is why virtual courts have been gaining momentum in the last decade, and are a critical possibility for remote workers to engage with, and once clarified in history, that much more effective on the local, then global level.

If you arrive at a juncture, where you just can’t evade foreign “chanting”, on and offline; being phrases continuously projected towards you, as far as AIP (Artifice Intelligent Property) goes, there is little to be done, or at least one might think.

Not a graft, but a remedy, is to locate their coordinates, in their nativity, in a land far, far away, and adjust accordingly. And with AIP, this was done from shifting over the medium term, from Natural Language Processing (NLP), to WXV’s Fluent Language Processing (FLP™).

One might suppose that this situation is only an illusion, however, there is much to be learned about such a scenario, and that type of AI, and is why being agile, and not “locked in”, on a programming language, is a surefire way to advance in regards to noise pollution, and urban nutrition.

On occasion, the impossibility of remaining clone free, does occur. As artificial intelligence learns how to replicate even the most complex of deterrents of raw intellectual property.

If plausible, scheduling the site map, as far releasing what the organisation is, of say, a website, and the relative updates, can serve to the public, the best way to reveal, what the clones are cloning, and in what time frame.

Because time moves forward, this is a great solution to preserving intangibles and their prior art. As there can be only a singular calendar event per individual, or personal, entity; which is the case of WXV.