When arriving at a conclusion, it is the orchestration which matters most.
Because at the end of this type of proof, you have to have clear scientific reasoning.
Then you can work through the proofing, with an architecture that isn’t just readable, but makes sense.
Which is more valuable?
From the standpoint of WXV, they are both essential.
Likening to either in a small or medium sized enterprise, versus a large company is a little bit clearer, but from a personal or private entity’s perspective, this is a no brainer comparison.
Contrary to popular belief, there are in fact scenarios which are future proof.
Not necessarily scenarios involving the human condition however, or involving error based mathematics.
While analysing your next org, think about which scenarios you can bank on being future proof, and which scenarios seem future proof, but are really not.
In some markets, the network worth is the dominant calculation for understanding a financial equation.
With abundant futures, the network worth becomes a little more gray area.
What other metrics do you use to incorporate into your financial matrix?
When analysing the orientation of something like the internet, depending on your perspective, anything can be correct.
What this means for designers, is that at the peak of understanding or education, there is always the other side of the market to analyse.
And in terms of the net, eventually after hemispherical analysis, there are multitudes of other organisations, which explain truthfully, which way is up.