If the purpose of building a business is to obtain abundance, then where does value fit in?
Does value supersede purpose in this scenario, or is getting to abundant value, valueless, or is that even possible in today’s competitive world?
With abundance, the question then becomes, what do people do with abundance, if there is no intersection of the aforementioned above?
When you think of scaling up, what do you think? Could be upwards and onwards in the right direction.
And when you’re managing a business in terms of metrics, and you’re using scaling up as a base, there are many new pathways which open up, which aren’t necessarily quantitative.
These other areas are subject to each entrepreneur’s recipe; but once you’re scaling up, these advancement areas will open up, and new mathematics can scale, and as can qualitative subsets, themselves.
Areas of expertise like music, film and the web, that most experts share, are macrographic displays, which are a conundrum for new viewers, as it is very difficult to analyse, the broader the scope.
Working with these typologies, is as difficult as it is to define, as it is to collate.
The real conundrum presents itself as being the residual of macro, when there is much to question, and little to be understood; hence, the web conundrum.
It’s never quite real, until something is finished. And in the wake of an event like levitating, physically, the intangible qualities, new and old, become a part of a greater story.
One of the biggest reasons that people choose to work in IP, is that the goods and services that they provide, on occasion, provide an explanation of a new experience, that wouldn’t have been explainable without an object, virtual or not.
This miracle, can be shown as being, still, not entirely possible to explain, however with intangible proof, this narrative transpires into being a little more believable.
There is a limit to what intellectual property law, can cover. Eventually the truth is already defined.
With Tyner Group Legal Engine°, the truthfulness and truthiness of IP law isn’t going to be altered that much further, for the most part, as this is based off the existing Tyner Group legal framework.
What does morph further, in the future, are the WXV Map Law Imprints, which each serve very different specialisations of law, via intellectual property, and location. What this means is the WXV x Tyner Group legalese framework is greater than the sum of its parts, as the WXV legal environment is broader and more open, while further IP law specialised forms° are added and refined.