When analysing the health of a technologic application like a LLM, it is important to look at this like an accessibility right.

This is because of the natural language processing heritage, a LLM has, and the type of programmer whom gets involved with such a model.

For WXV, the tech stack right has been leading itself towards crystallising itself from being an intraweb(s), into being comprehensible, also, as being a LLM.

The old internet was barely accessible a few years ago, while the modern web 1.0 was very active; making space for web 2.0s.

Whatever critic chooses as web 3 is one thing, and whatever WXV represents as Web 3.0+ is another; it is like watching a decades old movie and deciding if the special effects were actually real or not against a movie that was just released last week.

Regardless of the semantics, the old internet was successfully embedded, not refurbished or repurposed.

There is a limit to what intellectual property law, can cover. Eventually the truth is already defined.

With Tyner Group Legal Engine°, the truthfulness and truthiness of IP law isn’t going to be altered that much further, for the most part, as this is based off the existing Tyner Group legal framework.

What does morph further, in the future, are the WXV Map Law Imprints, which each serve very different specialisations of law, via intellectual property, and location. What this means is the WXV x Tyner Group legalese framework is greater than the sum of its parts, as the WXV legal environment is broader and more open, while further IP law specialised forms° are added and refined.